zizek peterson debate transcript
The paper contains a long digression about all the reasons the Soviet Union was terrible. Remember Pauls words from Galatians There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer male and female in Christ. increasingly erratic in the rest of the debates. We often need a master figure to push us out an inertia and, Im not afraid to say, that forces us to be free. It's quite interesting, but it's not The true opposite of egotist self-love is not altruism a concern for the common good but envy, resentment, which makes me act against my own interests. Really? They returned to their natural subject: who is the enemy? google, pretty well on the center-right, and pretty badly on the left (broadly). And if you think meaningful cause beyond the mere struggle for pleasurable survival. Moderated by Stephen J. Blackwood, it was held before an audience of 3,000 at Meridian Hall in Toronto on 19 April 2019. iek didnt really address the matter at hand, either, preferring to relish his enmities. And they both agreed, could not have agreed more, that it was all the fault of the academic left. agreement (as well they should, adopting neither deluded far-left or far-right You're currently offline; make sure to connect for latest articles. Its all anyone can do at this point. We're in for quite a night a quick word about format. My hero is here a black lady, Tarana Burke, who created the #MeToo campaign more than a decade ago. Peterson noted at the outset that he'd set a personal milestone: StubHub tickets to the debate were going for more money than Maple Leafs playoff ticketsa big deal in Toronto. They can develop into a permanent obsession sustained by obstacles that demand to be overcome in short, into a properly metaphysical passion that preserves the biologically rhythm, like endlessly prolonging satisfaction in courtly love, engaging in different perversions and so on and so on. A New World Order is emerging, a world of peaceful co-existence of civilisations, but in what way does it function? Peterson blamed cultural Marxism for phenomena like the movement to respect gender-neutral pronouns which, in his view, undermines freedom of speech. cordial and respectful, something I really appreciated. My point is that it looked like Peterson wasn't interested in replaying that kind of thing especially, not with Zizek. We will probably slide towards apocalypse, he said. Below is the transcript of Zizeks introductory statement. It was billed as a meeting of titans and that it was not. I have a hard time understanding Zizek, and am admittedly completely out of my depth when it comes to philosophy and Marxism and all the nitty gritty. with its constellation of thinkers. In such times of urgency, when we know we have to act but dont know how to act, thinking is needed. Aquella vez me parecieron ms slidos los argumentos del primero. It is todays capitalism that equalizers us too much and causes the loss of many talents. Most of the attacks on me are now precisely from left liberals. sticking to "his camp", but I feel like the resulting discussing ended up more They passionately support LGBT, they advocate charities and so on. So, how to act? Thanks for you work. Instead they often engage in self-destructive behavior. Peterson retreats into the integrity of character and Judeo-Christian values as he sees them. Regarding how the debate was receiving, judging from Twitter and some quick But is this really the lesson to be learned from mob killing, looting and burning on behalf of religion? Read the full transcript. He has published more than three, dozen books, many on the most seminal philosophers of the 19th and 20th centuries. We are never just instruments of some higher cause. Zizek Peterson Debate Transcript. Its trademarks universal health care, free education, and so on are continually diminished. If you're curious, here's the timestamp for the joke. It was officially titled Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, and was drummed up thoroughly. The paper contains a close reading of the Manifesto. I am not making just a joke here because I think it is exactly like this and thats the lesson psychoanalysis, that our sexuality, our sexual instincts are, of course, biologically determined but look what we humans made out of that. And, in the new afterword, Bell offers a bracing perspective of contemporary Western societies, revealing the crucial cultural fault lines we face as the 21st century is here. Look at Bernie Sanders program. They needed enemies, needed combat, because in their solitudes, they had so little to offer. The debate, titled "Happiness: Marxism vs. Capitalism," pitted Jordan Peterson against Slavoj iek, two of the West's reigning public intellectuals. IQ, Politics, and the Left: A Conversation with Douglas Murray Transcript Nina Paley: Animator Extraordinaire Transcript Aspen Ideas Festival: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars Transcript To cite this article: Ania Lian (2019): The Toronto Debate: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek on Ethics and Happiness, The European Legacy, DOI: 10.1080/10848770.2019.1616901 Both rejected happiness as a primary goal for individuals and societies. Of course, we are also natural beings, and our DNA as we all know overlaps I may be wrong around 98% with some monkeys. The Petersoniek debate, officially titled Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, was a debate between the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson (a clinical psychologist and critic of Marxism) and the Slovenian philosopher Slavoj iek (a psychoanalyst and Hegelian) on the relationship between Marxism, capitalism, and happiness. He makes a big deal out of how he obsessed about (or both), this part is the most interesting. A big deal, with huge numbers, and really very little underneath. It is just a version of what half a century ago in Europe was simply the predominant social democracy, and it is today decried as a threat to our freedoms, to the American way of life, and so on and so on. Due to a planned power outage on Friday, 1/14, between 8am-1pm PST, some services may be impacted. What appears as its excesses its regulatory zeal is I think an impotent reaction that masks the reality of a defeat. But even it its extreme form opening up our borders to the refugees, treating them like one of us they only provide what in medicine is called a symptomatic treatment. White, multi-culturalist liberals embody the lie of identity politics. It's funny to see Peterson The title of the debate was "Happiness: Capitalism v. Marxism." The structure of the debate was that each participant presented a thirty-minute introduction followed by a series of brief ten-minute responses to one another. The rest of the debate was (if memory serves) also interesting, but it gets even The turn towards culture as a key component of capitalist reproduction and concurrent to it the commodification of cultural life itself are I think crucial moments of capitalism expanded reproduction. But market success is also not innocent and neutral as a regulatory of the social recognition of competencies. I've talked to (which, unfortunately were more fanboys than rigorous with only surface differences (some, though not all, could be chalked to their Let me now briefly deal with in a friendly way I claim with what became known sorry for the irony as the lobster topic. So, how to react to this? It has been said of the debate that "nothing is a greater waste of time." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. Please note, during tonight's presentation, video, audio, and flash photography is prohibited and we have a strict zero, tolerance policy for any heckling or disruption. yardstick: In our daily lives, we pretend to desire things which we do not really desire, The strange bronze artifact perplexed scholars for more than a century, including how it traveled so far from home. Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on Facebook, Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on Twitter, Share Highlights of the debate of the century: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek on LinkedIn, Subscribe for counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday, Slavoj iek vs Jordan Peterson Debate Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism (Apr 2019), Why winning isnt the real purpose of arguing. But if violence perpetuated in the name of an idea is supposed to disqualify the idea, then more people have died in the name of communism and nationalism than any other idea. knowledgeable about communism. something wrong was said therein, you ought to engage the content rather than And, incidentally Im far from believing in ordinary peoples wisdom. And I claim the same goes for tradition. A warm welcome to all of you here this evening, both those here in the, theatre in Toronto and those following online. [19] Harrison Fluss and Sam Miller of Jacobin reported that Peterson made many factual errors, such as misunderstanding the labour theory of value, incorrectly associating Marx broadly with identity politics, and denying the existence of a Marxist philosophy of nature. You can find a transcript of it here. Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. First, of all, the commons of external nature, threatened by pollution, global warming and so on. Still, that criticism would be salutary for most "communists" He also denied there is an inherent tendency under capitalism to mistreat the workers, stating you dont rise to a position of authority that is reliable in a human society primarily by exploiting other people. Overall, Peterson appeared to see capitalism as the best, though imperfect, economic model. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Hundreds of millions raised from poverty into middle class existence. and our Zizek called out for the necessity of addressing climate change while also focusing on such issues as Bernie Sanders, whom he called an old-fashioned moralist. Zizek sees Sanders as being unfairly portrayed as a radical. Book deals for political prisoners still in jail. When somebody tries to convince me, in spite of all these problems, there is a light at the end of the tunnel, my instant reply is, Yes, and its another train coming towards us. I deeply appreciate evolutionary talk. We are responsible for our burdens. Are you also ready to affirm that Hitler was our enemy because his story was not heard? Zizek was hard to follow in his prepared statement, he becomes argument abbreviated: There are three necessary features which distinguish a bad Marx paper: The article also has a nice summary of Peterson's opening it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. They are both concerned with more fundamental. Secret Spice Girls dance parties of the wives of anti-western morality police. I call this the tankie-bashing bit. interrupts himself to add "I will finish immediately" before finishing the joke. It's also entertaining to watch, and I suspect this was the mode in which most "If you have a good theory, forget about the reality. Is there, in todays United States, really too much equality? Zizek is particularly culpable here, for I wanted to know that too! It will be certain only it will be too late, and I am well aware of the temptation to engage in precipitous extrapolations. Next point one should stop blaming hedonist egotism for our woes. They argued whether capitalism or communism would be the best economic and political system. The paper contains almost no references to any other texts, either by Marx or by other socialist thinkers. of the Century" was overhyped (overmarketed, really), and seemed poorly prepared By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. The tone of the debate was also noted to be very Thats the big of ideologies how to make good, decent people do horrible things. Its not just that in spite of all our natural and cultural differences the same divine sparks dwells in everyone. almost sweating from concentration trying to discern a thread. Peterson and Zizek Debate - transcribed by John Li - [email protected] - 916 623 5512 - https://chicago.academia.edu/JohnLi - // I used both voice to text software and then a manual read through - there are still plenty of transcription errors I havent caught and corrected (I didnt expect this to come out to be over 20 pages and how Petersons (native speaker of English) has been the harder one to transcribe. First by admitting we are in a deep mess. It can well secretly invert the standard renunciation accomplished to benefit others. Credits for this section should go to the hard work of Xiao Ouyang and Shunji Ukai //, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUhYdqB2Jh7CU5Le0XgktKaoXQmnTdbv0-_kE5BQL6Q/edit?usp=sharing, Thank you so much for this, I had trouble understanding Zizek's pronunciation of the book on Christ's Atheism on the cross. In a similar way, the Alt-Right obsession with cultural Marxism expresses the rejection to confront that phenomenon they criticise as the attack of the cultural Marxist plot moral degradation, sexual promiscuity, consumerist hedonism, and so on are the outcomes of the immanent dynamic of capitalist societies. The event was billed as the debate of the century, The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind, and it did have the feel of a heavyweight boxing match: Jordan Peterson, local boy, against the slapdash Slovenian Slavoj iek, considering Happiness: Capitalism vs Marxism in Toronto. But there is nonetheless the prospect of a catastrophe here. this event had the possibility to reach a much wider audience. Really? Peterson had trapped himself into a zero-sum game, Zizek had opened up a. Below is the transcript of Zizek's introductory statement. While the two take different political stances, both have been known to rail against political correctness and found that issue in common. Can we even imagine how the fragile balance of our earth functions and in what unpredictable ways geo-engineering can disturb it? First, on how happiness is often the wrong [Scattered Audience applause and cheers]Both Doctor iek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debatewe hopewill transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame Canadian bill prohibiting discrimination based on gender, "Jordan Peterson, Slavoj Zizek each draw fans at sold-out debate", "The 'debate of the century': what happened when Jordan Peterson debated Slavoj iek", "How Anti-Leftism Has Made Jordan Peterson a Mark for Fascist Propaganda", "There Is No One to Cheer for in the Potential Battle Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek", "Why do people find Jordan Peterson so convincing? On Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson: Nature, Culture, and the Displacement of Time. I will correct more when I get more time but I need to get back to work. semi-intentionally quite funny. Second on how modernity is characterized by the absence of authority (and It's hard not to crack up when out of time for For transcription of Zizeks first exposition (the actually coherent one I believe), I found that it had already been transcribed on Reddit during my own transcription so I integrated it into this one. Todays China combines these two features in its extreme form strong, totalitarian state, state-wide capitalist dynamics. This one is from the Guardian. But, it is instantly clear how this self-denigration brings a profit of its own. Similarly, he's crusading against Peterson El debate entre Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson posmodernismo. He said things like Marx thought the proletariat was good and the bourgeoisie was evil. In this sense, the image of Donald Trump is also a fetish, the last thing a liberal sees before confronting actual social tensions. Peterson was humiliated deeply in it, having to admit he'd never read any Marx despite demonizing him for years, and only having skimmed one of Marx' books before showing up to debate Marxism with an actual Marx scholar (among other. Now, let me give you a more problematic example in exactly the same way, liberal critics of Trump and alt-right never seriously ask how our liberal society could give birth to Trump. So, the term Cultural Marxism plays that of the Jewish plot in anti-Semitism. opinions), and that the debate was cordial, even mutually admirative at times. Peterson's more practically-oriented style also made his arguments a bit more approachable to non-academics. In his turn, the self-proclaimed pessimist Zizek didnt always stick the larger economic topics, and did not want to be called communist. Canad. I was surprised (and a bit disappointed) that Peterson didn't seem more Billed as "The Debate Transcripts | Jordan Peterson An archive of transcribed public lectures, interviews, podcasts, and YouTube videos. There is no simple democratic solution here. He's the sort of aging quitter we all hope to never be. A renunciation of pleasure can easily turn in pleasure of renunciation itself.
Immersive College Of Winterhold Patches,
Police Incident Sunnybank Today,
Articles Z